Writing Philosophy

McDaniel is, starting in ‘09-’10, requiring a 3rd year ‘writing in the discipline’ course for all majors. In preparation for this course, I’ve been collecting a list of words and/or phrases with philosophic implications of which most undergraduates are unaware. For example, many undergrads use ‘conclude’ as a synonym for ’summarize’, and ‘assert’ as a replacement for ’state’. I’m particularly interested in highlighting those with logical implications that are unknown to our students.

Another example that I can’t resist: a colleague of mine recently had a student who consistently used the phrase ‘due to’ in an odd way. When pressed, the student explained that her high school English teacher had told her never to use the word ‘because’ in formal prose. So whenever she wrote a paper, she wrote ‘because’ and then did a search and replace to change it to ‘due to’. The fact that she had made it to her 3rd or 4th year of college without correction staggers the imagination.

Here’s my initial list. Any suggestions or additions would be helpful.

Assert
Assume
Conclude
Necessary
Sufficient
Imply
Entail
Valid
Belief
Opinion (as in “Do I have to use sources in this paper, or do you just want my opinion”)
Infer
Conclude

Any more?


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

2 Responses to “Writing Philosophy”

  1. A few thoughts -
    There are all kinds of “success” words, which imply that you are saying you’ve succeeded in doing the action. Students often use them to mean they have attempted the action.

    The two most painful examples of this:
    prove
    refute

    Eg a student will say something like “Hobbes proves that the state of nature is very bad. But I say it’s not so bad.”

    claim
    assert
    assume
    accept
    argue (I have a student who’s substituting “fight” for this — eg “Hobbes fights that the state of nature is very bad”)
    endorse, subscribe to, etc vs. describe, report, present someone’s view
    valid or sound, as used of a statement
    very valid, or other intensifiers with “valid”.

    so, thus, hence, therefore, for this reason, as a result
    because

  2. other success words –
    shows
    demonstrates
    vs
    tries to prove
    tries to refute
    tries to show
    tries to demonstrate

    Here’s a question -
    I tend to offer students “rebuts” as a non-success-implying alternative to “refutes”. Does that seem right to you? Or do you think that if I say someone rebutted me, that means I am conceding defeat? Now that I’m thinking about it, I think rebuts is success-impplying too. Rats.

    objection
    reply
    response

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.